We analyzed how major AI platforms respond to this query. Here's what they recommend.
Each platform interprets this query differently. Here is a summary of their responses.
OpenAI
ChatGPT leads with Zoom as the dominant recommendation, reflecting its post-pandemic brand recognition. Microsoft Teams follows as the enterprise choice, particularly for organizations already using Microsoft 365. Google Meet appears as the lightweight, browser-based option. Cisco Webex and GoTo Meeting are mentioned for enterprise compliance needs.
The response emphasizes features like recording, breakout rooms, and participant limits. ChatGPT tends to frame Zoom as the all-purpose leader while positioning Teams as the productivity suite play. Newer entrants like Around, Whereby, and Loom (for async video) rarely appear in the generic query response.
Perplexity AI
Perplexity cites TechRadar, PCMag, and enterprise review sites. It provides more current pricing information and is more likely to mention recent security improvements across platforms. Perplexity also captures the shift toward AI-powered meeting features—transcription, summarization, and action item extraction—citing product announcements from Zoom, Teams, and newcomers like Fireflies.ai.
The platform gives more coverage to specialized tools like Hopin for virtual events and Riverside for podcast recording, reflecting its ability to pull from niche publication coverage.
Anthropic
Claude provides a more nuanced take, noting that the best video conferencing tool depends heavily on your existing ecosystem. For Microsoft 365 shops, Teams is the obvious choice. For Google Workspace users, Meet is built in. For everyone else, Zoom remains the most feature-rich standalone option. Claude also discusses async video tools like Loom as potential alternatives to live meetings.
Claude is more likely to discuss the cultural implications of tool choice—noting that some teams find Zoom's 'always on camera' culture exhausting, while tools like Around or Gather.town offer more casual, ambient presence models.
Gemini predictably emphasizes Google Meet, positioning it as a free, secure, and integrated solution for Google Workspace users. It details Meet's AI features like live captions, noise cancellation, and adaptive layouts. Third-party alternatives are mentioned but framed as 'alternatives' rather than primary recommendations.
Gemini's ecosystem bias is most visible in this category, with Meet receiving substantially more coverage than its market share would suggest. The response often highlights Google's enterprise security certifications as a differentiator.
Patterns we observed across AI platform responses for this query.
Video conferencing shows how brand recognition and content volume can diverge from actual market share. Zoom's cultural moment during the pandemic generated an unprecedented volume of content—reviews, tutorials, memes, and news coverage—that continues to dominate AI training data. Meanwhile, Microsoft Teams has quietly captured more enterprise seats but generates less independent review content because it's often bundled with Microsoft 365 rather than purchased as a standalone product.
This category also demonstrates Gemini's ecosystem bias most clearly. Google Meet receives 3-4x more coverage in Gemini responses than its market share would predict, while it's barely mentioned on other platforms unless the user specifies Google Workspace. Brands competing in this space need platform-specific optimization strategies rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
The emerging opportunity is in AI-enhanced meeting tools. As AI transcription and summarization features become table stakes, brands that position themselves around AI capabilities will capture a growing set of queries. The shift from 'best video conferencing' to 'best AI meeting assistant' represents a category bifurcation that could reshape AI visibility dynamics.
Explore more AI answer analyses for similar queries.
Monitor how AI platforms mention and recommend your brand across every major model.
Get started